Skip to content

Louisiana Republicans Splinter on Issue of Expanding Access to Affordable Health Care

Dardenne: “Discussion Needs to Take Place Because We Are Going to Be Responsible for Uncompensated Care Costs”

BATON ROUGE — Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne’s comments on WRKF’s Jim Engster Show yesterday display the dissension within Louisiana Republican ranks on the issue of expanding access to affordable health care in the upcoming legislative session.

“When Republicans like Congressman Vance McAllister are saying that Medicaid expansion would be a ‘pretty darn good return on your investment,’ and Jay Dardenne is acknowledging that Louisiana must deal with uncompensated care costs, it’s obvious that the LAGOP is far from unified on this issue,” said Louisiana Democratic Party Chair Karen Carter Peterson. “For any Louisiana Republicans that want to accept reality — the reality that accepting federal Medicaid dollars would save hundreds of millions in our state budget and expand access to affordable health care for 250,000 working Louisianians — we welcome them to the discussion.”

In response to a question on yesterday’s Jim Engster Show, Dardenne refused to endorse Medicaid expansion but suggested the state look at alternatives like “what Arkansas and some other states did,” saying:

“A number of waivers have been given, and I think that discussion needs to take place because we are going to be responsible for uncompensated care costs for people who are not Medicaid-eligible one way or the other. It’s been one of the big hits on the budget, one of the big challenges we’ve had, and I think we need to have that discussion.”

Earlier this week, Rep. Vance McAllister expanded on his support for Medicaid expansion, telling The Advocate’s Stephanie Grace:

“I thought, ‘You know what, I’m not going to skirt the issue. Republican, Democrat, it don’t matter. Those working poor have paid that money in. That money’s going to Washington. It’s their money,’ For me to say I’m against Medicaid expansion makes me the best congressman California and Massachusetts could ever have, because that’s where that money’s gonna go.

“It’s about doing what’s right. You keep your people healthy, they’ll continue to work. They’ll do better. The money’s there. As a business guy, I don’t like Gov. Jindal standing up there and trying to use political points” to argue that the state can’t afford the small fraction it would eventually have to pay to draw down billions in benefits. It don’t take Einstein to figure out that’s a pretty darn good return on your investment.”

 ###